Change, NOW!

That's right, I don't want your pocket money*, I'm talking change in the political upheaval sense. 

(This painting and resulting photo does not belong to me, though it should.)

It seems that at least once a week, a news item comes out regarding decisions or announcements made by our current federal government. These news items always add to my ever growing rage.


Since I've been MIA on this sorry excuse for a blog for a while, I figure I will make a simple list of my current annoyances. That way, I get my thoughts out in the open, maybe release some tension, AND spread my rage to my lovely subscribers - which can only help inspire the change that I'm looking for... right? :D


OH! And I've included a lot of fun links, so click on them! Teehee... I know which one my favourite is...

• John Baird pulling Canada's contribution out of the international pot of money that makes up UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
• His reasoning? The United Nations decided to recognize Palestine as a nation. What a piece of shit! As if he has the right to drop funding on behalf of all Canadians over something based solely on religion. Holy hell, this makes me angry! 
• What do we deserve? Baird should be horse whipped, and the UN should drop all of Canada's UNESCO World Heritage Site designations.

• Anything that has come out of Peter Kent's ugly mouth since he was appointed Minister of the Environment. Oh man... I can't believe this tripe this ass-wipe is getting away with.
• Example 1: Pompously taunting opposition members because they were DENIED attendance to the last Climate Conference - and just to point out, there is a long-standing precedence that opposition members are to be part of the Canadian delegation to these conferences... to REPRESENT ALL OF CANADA. 
• Example 2: Giving the Calgary Chamber of Commerce  a *wink wink, nudge nudge* that they'll have no problems from HIS ministry when it comes to resource development. Streamlining project approvals, apparently... "Environment Minister Peter Kent made no apologies Thursday for making economic considerations a primary concern for his department."  (Read more here)  

Watch the video here.

• Bill C-10. Holy eff, what to even say about this travesty? Again I say, anyone who voted for these screwballs, or anyone who didn't vote, can kiss my arse. This bill will literally put people growing pot plants in jail longer than pedophiles that have sexually abused children. DOES THIS SOUND LIKE A CANADA YOU WANT TO LIVE IN? Please say no. Or else move to Iran and witness as much injustice as you wish! 

• Changes to Old Age Security: How should we save money... hm... oh! Instead of being truly fiscally responsible by not buying 65 SINGLE ENGINE fighter jets for $140 mil a jet, pouring money into dying industries like the tar sands and oil extraction, wasting money by scrapping expensive programs instead of revamping them (LONG GUN REGISTRY: they're even going to DESTROY the information the program gathered... bu wha?!!?), we'll just force our seniors to work an extra 2 years before they can finally rest! Oh goody! 

Okay, I could literally go on and on and on and on, and this has taken me long enough (I've had to go back and delete some longer rants... though funny and very thought provoking, I know what it's like to see long portions of text and have your brain shut off. :D).

I do, however, feel a touch better. I feel like I have now identified my adversaries (much like our lovely government did in some documents, referring to aboriginal groups and tar sands opponents as ADVERSARIES and not ALLIES of tar sands and government supporters... what the shit is going on in this country?!?!)

Best response to that tripe can be viewed here! :D  

Alright folks, I know you've probably heard this quote a bajillion times, but hear it again! Or, read it, again... you know what I mean...

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." 

                                                                               - Ghandi

* Unless you have quarters to give me... I never seem to have enough for laundry. Grrrr

Can YOU define "ozone" ?

Me! Me! I know, I know!!!! *hand frantically waving in the air*  - more on ozone later. 

It's no secret that our current government doesn't give a shit about the environment. Some fine examples include: recently slashing over 700 jobs in Environment Canada, trying to sabotage global climate initiatives, cancelling federal environmental assessments for 2 years to help "stimulate the economy", and the overall cause for the aforementioned situations - appointing dip-shits as Environment Ministers. Our current Minister of the Environment is certainly no exception!

* I won't even play around with this photo. It has dip-shit written all over it. Thank you Mr Kent. It's property of the Vancouver Sun, by the by.

I get that ministers aren't always necessarily appointed for their particular ministerial know-how, but this man (like the rest of them) not only has zero experience and interest in the position, he also can't even do a decent job PRETENDING that he knows what's going on. At least Jim Prentice tried! (haha, okay, tried for a Conservative...)

Here comes the ozone question, class!  Two weeks ago in the House of Commons, when asked to define "ozone", Kent refused. WHAT?!? 

(If you can give me a definition of "ozone" in the comments section, you get a prize! For real. So do it! Best answer wins.)

This man is negotiating international treaties about this stuff! He is approving possible legislation on this very topic! ARRRG!

 

And now, the genius that is Peter Kent (you remember him from Global, right class?) is representing us at the Durban Climate Conference. WHERE he has thus far broken an international treaty on behalf of you & I by stating that Canada is pulling out of our current Kyoto commitments, he is therefore sabotaging any hope for a better Kyoto Accord on behalf of Canada, and has further damaged Canada's overall reputation on the world stage. 

UGH! I am so irate over this person right now.

I strongly feel it's time to get rid of the title Minister of the Environment until we have a government that is willing to put qualified, serious candidates in the seat. This is effing ridiculous.

Read the links in this, and please join me in writing to the disHonourable Peter Kent to express our displeasure at his terrible, lackluster representation of our country at international forums:

        Hill Office - Minister of the Environment Peter Kent      (I refuse to address him as "Honourable")

        House of Commons

        Ottawa, Ontario

        K1A 0A6

"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment."

                                                                     - Ansel Adams

Isn't it, though?

'Til next time... AND DON'T FORGET YOUR CHALLENGE!

Shit-giving

I recently posted a photo onto Farcebook that spoke to me... it wasn't until I realized that it spoke to a childish, whining part of me that I removed it. 


The photo in question:

I get what it's all about. And I'm guessing that the creator of this graphic has suffered years of utter frustration. Frustration from trying to get a worthy message across that continually falls on deaf ears and blind eyes; of believing passionately that something is fundamentally wrong and having no one care; of hoping that meaningful discussion would come from the news, but not being able to sift through the endless piles of celebrity gossip and unimportant tripe...  the causes of frustration for your average justice-mongering human are endless.


But I don't think inciting negativity helps, and this image gives me bad vibes. As the tagline of the image says "The society we live in is seriously flawed" - yes, but paying tribute to the life of a rich, pseudo-celebrity is the LEAST of our flaws, wouldn't you say?


* If someone could explain to me the tweet symbol and direction to iPhone4s, that would be nice... unless the plan is, when marketing folks look at trending, this image will be attached to a bunch of juicy iPhone hits? Not a clue. 


[ Side note: what a useless waste of time Twitter is... people should be spending their limited amount of time on this earth doing important things on computers... like sporadic blogging and surfing Regretsy.com (if you haven't seen the latter, GO! I know I was being slightly snotty with that wasting time comment, but hell, you may as well laugh during your short, earthly life).]


Anyway, my suggestion for a more effective, deeper-rooted image would be a bit more problem-probing, and wouldn't target the death of one person who was brought to fame by the very consumers who are causing the problems in this world. 


Something more liiiiiike:

Or, even BETTER!:

See what I mean about the importance level of a person dying and the public lamenting (though I say enough is enough, already) versus something as trivial as a technological inconvenience, or which rich guido will catch the clap next?


Okay, now my mind isn't as burdened by the posting of this photo. I hope you share my sentiments, or at least understand. Now I can sleep.


No quote for this one... I have created two tonight for the lovely photos above. I hope you enjoyed them. Bonne nuit.

Paint It Green, Make Some Green

In today's corporate society, no one is safe. Not even Burt and his Bees. *sigh*


When I started reading Adria Vasil's marvelous book Ecoholic many moons ago, I thought I was the shit - you know, scoffing at my friends for buying toxic products, changing all of my own personal products over to Burt's Bees, patronizing my mother for falling victim to splashy "All-Natural!" promises from chemical-laden beauty products, eating Kashi cereal like it was going out of style (it isn't even that good... pfft). I was smug back then. Who am I kidding, I still am. 

Well, maybe a little less smug since reading this: http://www.emagazine.com/magazine/the-big-green-buyout


Mother effer! I've been SCAMMED!  


Burt's Bees? I have invested so much in you! And you go and sell out? To CLOROX? Good grief! What has the world come to? 

Yes, as in the bleach company. The company who named themselves after CHLORINE and SODIUM HYDROXIDE. The same ingredients Mr Burt and his Bees have shunned for decades. Did your Bees buzz some bad moral advice in your ears while you were gardening, Burt? Giving the bad guys carte blanche to profit from well-meaning consumers is wrong.


And Kashi? Eff you! Don't trick people with your small-time company, feel-good ad ploys. You taste like cardboard and you sold out to Kellogg's. Go play with Snap, Crackle and Pop, they LOVE selling out and making crappy commercials. 


Read the article. 


I suck at blogging. But I should really stop saying that and just become more consistent. Deal!


Following tradition, I'll end this with a quote. Simple, popular, and just happens to be the underlying motto for all purchases I make. Don't you roll your eyes at me!

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."

                                                                      - Mahatma Gandhi

Follow up!

Long overdue, I know! But here is the letter/e-mail I drafted for the MPs who took part in the Anti-choice rally in Ottawa last month. *The particular letter I'm sharing is one I tailored specifically for MP Scott Reid, douchebag of the year!*

If you feel the same, feel completely free to use any and all of my words and ideas to send your own letters! (See previous post for addresses.)

Read on!

______________________________________________________________________

Mr Reid:

I am writing to you today to share my concerns regarding a rally that you attended last month.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but when one voices them so strongly in the form of attending a controversial rally, one must be prepared to explain themselves. Especially when one is an elected representative - representing all opinions within your constituency, from all walks of life, and from both ends of the opinion spectrum. You, sir, are currently representing me.

The issue of abortion is a touchy one, and for good reason. When the basis of a debate is rooted in definitions of morality (usually stemming from a religious perspective) and emotional reaction, I believe that education and understanding are a necessity from both sides of the debate for it to be a functional one.

First, I must clarify something. This debate is NOT over the morality of abortion, it is about the legality of the medical procedure. We all must be clear about this.

For instance, there are people the world over who believe that alcohol is an immoral thing (for many reasons - not just religious or moral) and should not be legal. We do not call these people "pro-health" supporters, they are prohibitionists - they desire to legally stop the manufacturing, selling, etc, of alcohol. (See what I'm saying?)

The title of a "pro-life rally" is a misnomer, plain and simple. "Pro-life" supporters are "anti-choice" supporters in the issue of the legality of a woman's right to choose. The sides are pro or anti choice. Please do not continue to spread this misleading term by attending such rallies. To say one side is "pro-life" means the other side is "pro-death". And what nonsense that is!

Secondly, no sane person is PRO abortion. There is a tremendously large faction of our society that is pro-CHOICE, but definitely not pro-abortion. In no instance is it ever a desirable procedure for anyone. No one. (Well, except a few men I have met in my life who would rather have a woman "take care of the problem" of pregnancy than become fathers. Just one example of why men should only have a small role in this very debate. Meaning, also you.)

To have informed debates based on fact and reason to determine the best route for laws in this country are encouraged and necessary. But to take part in an emotionally-charged demonstration based on personal/religious beliefs when you should be looking at how to improve the laws of this land is a waste of time (not to mention confusing to the electorate).

I hope you will also ponder the utter ridiculousness of the situation: a small group of male Members of Parliament pontificating on Parliament Hill about what I, as a woman, should and shouldn't be able to do with my own body. What unmitigated gall you had in speaking at this rally - and on my behalf! Imagine, attempting to control the reproductive rights of an entire sex?!

Until you have witnessed every instance in which an unwanted pregnancy can occur, and until you have experienced what it is like to be a woman (or a young girl, in a lot of cases) who has been impregnated unwillingly, you have no right to lecture a community, society or country on what females should and should not legally do with their own bodies. And until the causes of unwanted pregnancy (violence against women, children's rights, sexual education) are tackled, you cannot criminalize abortion.

I also highly recommend that you attend women's safety rallies/meetings, and invest in sexual education and self defence courses for young people and women in our riding. You see, if the causes of unwanted pregnancies were tackled, abortion wouldn't be an issue at all. Throw your energy in that direction, why don't you, instead of perpetuating divisions in your community.

Thank you for your time.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Thoughts? Comments?

Will you be writing these people to express your opinions? HAVE you written anyone on this topic before? SHARE PLEASE! :D

(No quote, as this is a follow up post. I know how sad you must be.)

Choice Words for Anti-Choice-ers

I understand that it takes every kind of people to make the world go round (thank you, Robert Palmer), and I also understand that disagreements on emotionally-charged issues are bound to happen between said people. I can also always see both sides of arguments, and can usually control my feelings of rage.

However, when I read this article, and saw that 3 Conservative MPs from my area and one former Liberal MP (all men, of course) were present at this particular rally, I was fuming mad.

First of all, I must attempt at correcting something... "Pro-life" is an inaccurate moniker for those who think abortion should be illegal. As a rational human being, I can guarantee you that no woman WANTS to have an abortion (if they do, there is some strange, separate problem going on in her brain that has zero to do with legal abortions). No female in this world wakes up in the morning and thinks "Today feels like an excellent day to get an abortion!". Pretending that any woman or man who believes in the right to choose is a murderer is ridiculous and incorrect. So really, the two sides are pro-choice and anti-choice. That's what it boils down to.

Okay, so... I am not a sexist person, but in this particular debate, I am utterly at a loss for an explanation as to why men are involved at all. I understand that they help sow the seeds that reside in the wombs of women that are key in this particular debate, but if those seeds were correctly planted every time - respectfully, lovingly and purposefully - ABORTIONS WOULD NEVER EVEN HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED.

This wouldn't be a question or a debate if men had even the slightest chance of mistakenly becoming impregnated. Seriously, it wouldn't. Luckily for those of you who are not penile-challenged, you do not have to worry about whether you want to carry the result of a rape/assault/molestation in you for 9 months, completely altering your already altered life. Once adulthood is reached, becoming the victim of sexual assault/rape/molestation doesn't even have to cross the mind of males (children are a whole other separate subset of victims).

I also understand that women get abortions simply due to an ill-timed/unwanted pregnancy. This screams of irresponsibility in my opinion, but it's her body, and it's her life - I'm not going to an anti-choice rally to make abortions illegal because she made choices I might not necessarily make.

This is also a simple matter of healthcare. If abortions are illegal, they become unregulated, unchecked procedures outside of the realm of safety. Women die as a result.

It is never an easy choice for any woman, but it should always be a choice. You can never anticipate the countless scenarios in which an abortion of a pregnancy may be an option or a necessity.

I plan on spending part of my afternoon writing to each MP that was present at the rally. They have no right pointing fingers and wagging tongues at an issue that they cannot even begin to comprehend.

No quote on this one. I just want you all to think about the wombs in your life, be they your own or belonging to those you love. Back alley hack jobs with coat hangers have no business near the wombs of desperate women.

Tomorrow: Get off of your rat's ass and vote!

... is what I say to you folks who "don't give a rat's ass" about this election. That's RIGHT!

Honestly, this is all I can say. Please, please, please vote. Go and refuse your ballot if you don't know who to vote for. They will record that ballot, it will still count in the long run!

"Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society..."

- Stephen Harper

Yes... he actually said this... Keep it in mind tomorrow! Do you really want him running your country? If you vote for your local Conservative, you are voting for him - he has ensured his MPs are all puppets.

"Not voting is a vote for the guy you don't want to win."

- Bob Moore

My father has been saying this for years. I finally get it.

Happy voting!

Crying Shame

True, true... in oh so many ways...

* If you don't feel like reading this highly entertaining, well thought-out piece of literature,

just click here and do yo' thang. Pretty please with maple syrup on top? :P

Youth seem to scare the bejeebuz out of our current government. I laughed out loud when I heard about this story. To sum up: a communications director (Michael Sona) for a Conservative candidate (Marty Burke) tried to put the kibosh on student votes cast last Wednesday at an on-campus polling station.

So not only are Conservatives shaking in their penny loafers (no doubt, someone in that party wears 'em), but they are also a hugely petty bunch.

I can never shake the image of all of the politicians as children in a schoolyard. It's quite disturbing, really (in a creepy-disturbing way... not sad-disturbing... seriously, imagine Harper's head on a childs body!).

In this particular case, the Conservative party is represented by the snot-nosed brat who is on the verge of being sent to his room without dessert. Of course, a temper tantrum ensues. Trying to grab at things, whining, complaining, crying (I bet Mr Sona cried... I BET YOU), and stomping off with some type of warning.

Mr Sona followed his tantrum by contacting Elections Canada and whining. After it all got sorted, the ballots were considered legally obtained and will indeed be counted come May 2nd. No problem then, right?

WRONG!

Elections Canada has now put their own kibosh on special polling stations located at university campuses. They will no longer happen. The damage is done, thanks to an over zealous Conservative campaign helper.

What an utter and total pile of moose turds!

It is common sense to have special polling stations at universities/colleges. The people who reside on these campuses are NOT AT HOME to vote in their HOME riding. If they had this at my post-secondary institutions, many young people would have voted who in the end did not. I understand that it's not the hardest thing ever to vote away from your home riding, but when I was a student at a small town college with no mode of transportation, poor, tired all of the time, etc etc, voting was a chore EVEN FOR ME! That says something, people!

PLEASE! Sign this petition! This is a travesty, an utter crying shame. We need to turn it around - it can be done!

So can getting rid of Harper and his awful, snot-nosed cronies! I have hope!

"All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field."

- Albert Einstein